Page last modified 22:06, 11 Sep 2008 by Van.Woods
BIM Wiki > Collaborate > Projects > Archive > 2008 AIA TAP BIM Award Winners
2008 AIA TAP BIM Award Winners
Table of contents
- 1. Project Name
- 2. Team Members
- 3. Assignments
- 4. Notes
- 5. [Additional Headers]
Team Members
Volunteers:
- Chris Hubbard, Quarry Group
- Prof. Tammy McCuen, U of OK
- Hector Torres, Trans Systems
- Mathew Miller, SMPC Architects
- Mat Krogulecki, MACTEC
- Brian Russell, ASG Architects
- Van Woods, BIM Wiki
- Patrick Suermann, U of FL
Assignments
| Primary Reviewer | Secondary Reviewer | Year | Award | Category | Project Name | Firm Name |
| McCuen | Miller | 2008 | Citation | Creating Stellar Architecture Using BIM | Wayne L. Morse U.S. Courthouse, Eugene, OR | Morphosis |
| Hubbard | Suermann | 2008 | Citation | Design/Delivery Process Innovation Using BIM | One Island East, Hong Kong | Gehry Technologies, Asia |
| Hubbard | Russell | 2008 | Citation | Design/Delivery Process Innovation Using BIM | Capture and modeling of existing building conditions using 3D laser scanning | GSA |
| Russell | Torres | 2008 | Honorable Mention | Design/Delivery Process Innovation Using BIM | 5 Communities Libraries Project, BNBuilders, Inc. | BNBuilders, Inc. |
| Russell | Hubbard | 2008 | Citation | Outstanding Sustainable Design Using BIM | Pilot Projects using BIM-based sustainable design tools | GSA |
| Russell | Hubbard | 2008 | Citation | Support for Human Use and Innovative Program Requirements Using BIM | Automated Circulation Validation using BIM | GSA |
| Hubbard | Russell | 2008 | Citation | Academic Program or Curriculum Development | Studio 515, University of Illinois at Chicago | Studio 515 |
| Krogulecki | Suermann | 2008 | Citation | Academic Program or Curriculum Development | University of Oklahoma | University of Oklahoma |
| Woods | McCuen | 2008 | Citation | Academic Program or Curriculum Development | University of Wyoming | University of Wyoming |
| Woods | McCuen | 2008 | Citation | Academic Program or Curriculum Development | Stanford University | Stanford University |
| Krogulecki | Woods | 2008 | Citation | Jury's Choice | BIMStorm:LAX | Onuma, Inc. |
Notes
- Note that all submissions have already signed waivers for publication and use:
-
"By making a submission, each entrant verifies that the information contained therein is complete and correct and the entrant agrees to hold harmless the American Institute of Architects for any and all damages arising from the use of this information.Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the entrant. Each entrant further certifies that permission has been obtained from the owners and the photographers to publish the information and photography submitted and releases and authorizes the American Institute of Architects to use all such material."
- Tag page
- What links here
Files 55
Images 4
Viewing 1 - 4 of 4 images | View All
.bmp?size=webview "LAX-BIMStorm - Score Comparison (1).bmp")
.bmp){kind=link}
Viewing 6 of 6 comments: view all
#1
suermann says:
PDF or word doc submissions and submission-author contact information appearing soon. However, feel free to start now. it really only takes 5-15 minutes for your first try!
Posted 11:00, 24 Jul 2008
#2
Van.Woods says:
Patrick, can you clarify the instructions. I wanted to start working on this but wasn't clear on what exactly to do. Thanks!!
Posted 15:34, 24 Jul 2008
#3
suermann says:
Van,
For you, go to the projects for which you are the primary evaluator: the Stanford and Wyoming submissions. After reding through these, open the Excel spreadsheet. Go through the 11 categories evaluated in the I-CMM and "score" where you think the submissions stand with regard to the level of maturity they teach, espouse, whatever. When you are done, you will have an overall score. COmpare that with the person doing the secondary eval (Tammy McCuen) and see how she scored them. See if there are any major differences. "Finalize" your score. Now call the submission authors and talk through the process with them and see if they agree with you. If there is info that they tell you that was not in the PDF submissions, then take this new "evidence" into account and change the score accordingly. Your score will be FINAL and you are done!
Posted 16:35, 24 Jul 2008
#5
Admin says:
Note to all, FYI when you upload a new version of your file, the previous one can be accessed if necessary by using the plus icon next to the file name and secondly that each version maintains its own description, so you can use that to indicate a summary of what has changed in that version.
Posted 22:25, 29 Jul 2008
#6
suermann says:
When taking notes, please be sure to document differences in primary and secondary scores. For example, the Primary Evaluator gets a score of 80.3 and the Secondary evaluator arrives at a score of 73.5. I would like to know what the ranges are and where the main differences occur. This will help us improve the I-CMM.
Posted 16:33, 12 Aug 2008
#7
suermann says:
Please be sure to complete your internal reviews and make the final phone calls to to ultimatley finalize your evals. Then, also please update the status tracker so I won't bug you all and can watch status online. Thanks - almost at the finish line!
Posted 13:25, 20 Aug 2008
Viewing 6 of 6 comments: view all
You must login to post a comment.
.gif)
BIM Wiki by BIM Foundation Co-Op and all user submitted content (unless specified otherwise)
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license.